White House’s push for memory safety: challenges, changes, costs

April 6, 2024
1 min read




White House’s Call for Memory Safety Brings Challenges, Changes, and Costs

TLDR:

Key Points:

  • The White House Office of the National Cyber Director (ONCD) calls for a shift to memory-safe programming languages for secure software development.
  • Legacy systems and the costs associated with transitioning to memory-safe languages are major challenges in implementing this strategy.

In the recent article by Dark Reading, the White House’s call for memory safety in software development is highlighted. The ONCD’s publication, “Back to the Building Blocks: A Path Toward Secure and Measurable Software,” emphasizes the importance of memory-safe programming languages in enhancing cybersecurity. The article discusses the challenges, changes, and costs associated with this strategic shift.

The Memory Safety Imperative:

The article stresses that traditional programming languages often lead to memory safety vulnerabilities, accounting for a significant percentage of security issues. The shift to memory-safe programming languages is deemed crucial in developing software that is secure by design. However, addressing legacy systems developed in C and C++ poses a complex challenge, as rewriting these systems can be expensive and disrupt critical business processes.

Economic and Technical Considerations:

Organizations face formidable costs in transitioning to memory-safe languages, requiring a strategic decision to ensure the security of the digital infrastructure. Fortunately, advancements in technology, such as code analysis tools, can assist in identifying and remediating unsafe code practices, reducing the barriers to adopting safe coding practices.

A Collaborative Effort Towards a Secure Future:

The article underscores the importance of collaboration between policymakers, vendors, and industry leaders in advancing memory safety efforts. Examples of industry leaders investing in memory-safe languages, such as Mozilla, Microsoft, and Google, are highlighted. Practical steps, such as education and training, gradual transition plans, leveraging automation tools, and policy development, are recommended to meet the ONCD’s recommendations.

Conclusion:

Improving security in software development requires a collaborative effort between the public and private sectors. While transitioning to memory-safe coding languages presents challenges, progress is being made with technological innovations and commitments from global technology leaders. The article emphasizes the need for ongoing collaboration, education, and strategic planning to enhance cybersecurity and secure the digital economy.


Latest from Blog

EU push for unified incident report rules

TLDR: The Federation of European Risk Management Associations (FERMA) is urging the EU to harmonize cyber incident reporting requirements ahead of new legislation. Upcoming legislation such as the NIS2 Directive, DORA, and